Number for epic games2/19/2024 ![]() ![]() Epic boss Tim Sweeney expects the Epic Games Store won't turn a profit for another three or four years. Super Meat Boy cost $0.52 per user.Įpic is of course losing hundreds of millions of dollars in its war against Steam. The aforementioned Mutant Year Zero, for example, cost Epic $5.05 per user. Some games cost Epic more during the period, some less. That is, Epic reckons it spent $1.74 acquiring each user who snapped up Subnautica. So, in the case of Subnautica, which was redeemed 4.4m times, the user acquisition cost was $1.74. This is worked out by dividing the "buyout price" by the number of new Epic accounts the free game secured. Interestingly, the document shows what really matters to Epic: the user acquisition cost. □ /5hkLb1VEjj- Simon Carless To see this content please enable targeting cookies. Want to know how much $ the devs of those 'free' Epic Games Store games got, & how many copies were grabbed? Here's the first 9 months to September 2019. Overall, Epic spent nearly $12m on nabbing 38 games to release for free in the first nine months of the Epic Games Store's life. Ubisoft got a paltry $63,000 for For Honor, though. $1.5m for Batman Arkham to go free on the Epic Games Store. ![]() Team Meat's wonderful Super Meat Boy, on the other hand, cost just $50,000.Įlsewhere, Funcom's Mutant Year Zero cost a cool $1m, whereas the brilliant Fez cost $75,000. The list tells us, for example, Epic paid $1.4m to get Subnautica as a free game. Eurogamer news cast: are 'metaverse economies' the future of video games? The company has said it will "take all measures" to resume sales of the affected watches in the U.S.The Epic versus Apple trial keeps on giving: this time we know how much Epic paid on a per title basis for the free games released during the first nine months of the Epic Games Store's life.Ī document spotted and tweeted by GameDiscoverCo founder Simon Carless lists all the free games released on the Epic Games Store in the nine months to September 2019 - and how much Epic paid for each of them. The ruling from the International Trade Commission, which is separate from the case that was before a jury, is being contested by Apple. While Masimo could not make its case to a jury, the trial did reveal that Apple discussed the idea of acquiring Masimo at one point before ultimately deciding against it. In May, the patent fight stumped a jury, which could not reach a unanimous verdict on the question of whether Apple stole the idea for its blood oxygen feature from Masimo. Masimo has claimed in legal filings that Apple poached the employees in order to illegally duplicate its technology.Īpple has denied that it violated any Masimo patents, saying Apple consulted with several medical technology companies before coming up with its own version of the blood oxygen tool. Later, Apple hired two Masimo executives and key engineers away from the company. "Apple likes to play hardball with other companies, and sometimes it helps them reach more favorable deals over things like licensing."Īn Apple spokesperson confirmed the sales pause but declined further comment.Īccording to court documents, Masimo held meetings with Apple back in 2013 about using the medical technology company's tools in Apple products, but the talks broke down. innovation, and I think they're hoping the Biden administration recognizes that and agrees with them to get this overturned," he said. "Apple is the gold standard when it comes to U.S. It would help explain why Apple did not strike a licensing agreement with Masimo and has instead let the dispute drag out for months. The White House could undo the commission's decision, which Munster said Apple is likely counting on. "The bigger question I have is, 'What will be the duration of this?' " "Most who wanted to buy a watch as a holiday gift have done so already," Munster said. Gene Munster, a longtime Apple analyst, said yanking the new watches from retail stores in the final stretch of the holiday shopping season is unfortunate timing for the company, but he expects a "fractional at most" impact on sales. "The decision to exclude certain foreign-made models of the Apple Watch demonstrates that even the world's most powerful company must abide by the law," a Masimo spokesperson said in a statement to NPR. Masimo, a publicly-traded company based in Irvine, Calif., that sells patient monitoring devices to hospitals, viewed Apple's decision to pause watch sales as a vindication. The White House has until Christmas Day to act on the decision. Apple has been fighting the commission's ruling and is asking the Biden administration to reverse it. The commission, which advises the White House and Congress on matters including intellectual property disputes, is overseen by the president. Technology Epic Games beat Google but lost to Apple in monopoly lawsuits.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |